Who is better, Lovellette or Ogwumike?
Nneka Ogwumike leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.6 for Clyde Lovellette — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nneka Ogwumike above Clyde Lovellette: 82.8 vs 82.6. Nneka Ogwumike leads on Longevity, Statistics. Clyde Lovellette leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ogwumike wins: Longevity, Statistics
Lovellette wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/clyde-lovellette-vs-nneka-ogwumike
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ogwumike leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Lovellette | 0 | 0 | 8.2 | 26.9 | 92.6 | 171.6 |
| 🇺🇸 Ogwumike | 0 | 0 | 14 | 28 | 57.6 | 140.8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LovelletteRetired | OgwumikeActive |
|---|---|---|
| NBA championships | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| NCAA championships | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 4 | 8 |
| Career points per game | 17 | — |
| WNBA titles | — | 1 |
| WNBA MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Career points | — | 6,500 |
| Field-goal percentage peak | — | 0.665 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Nneka Ogwumike leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.6 for Clyde Lovellette — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lovellette scores higher on dominance, honours. Ogwumike leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lovellette: 82.6, Ogwumike: 82.8.
Make your case for Lovellette vs Ogwumike. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.