Who is better, Carrozza or Pankratov?
Coby Carrozza leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.8 for Denis Pankratov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Coby Carrozza above Denis Pankratov: 79.9 vs 79.8. Coby Carrozza leads on Statistics, Honours. Denis Pankratov leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Carrozza wins: Honours, Statistics
Pankratov wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/coby-carrozza-vs-denis-pankratov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Carrozza leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Carrozza | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 358 | 698 |
| 🇷🇺 Pankratov | 0 | 0 | 64 | 136 | 310 | 690 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CarrozzaActive | PankratovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | — |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| United States national medals | 4 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 1 | — |
| Relay finals | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| World records set | — | 5 |
| European Championship golds | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Coby Carrozza leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.8 for Denis Pankratov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pankratov scores higher on peak, dominance. Carrozza leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carrozza: 79.9, Pankratov: 79.8.
Make your case for Carrozza vs Pankratov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.