Who is better, coldzera or Saksa?
Marcelo "coldzera" David leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Martin "Saksa" Sazdov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Marcelo "coldzera" David and Martin "Saksa" Sazdov level at 84.7. Marcelo "coldzera" David leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Martin "Saksa" Sazdov leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →coldzera wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Saksa wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/coldzera-vs-es-saksa
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
coldzera leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Saksa — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | coldzeraRetired · FaZe Clan | SaksaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 2 | 3 |
| HLTV Player of the Year | 2 | — |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | 6 | — |
| Career rating 2.0 | 1.15 | — |
| Big event MVPs | 9 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 1.1 | — |
| The International appearances | — | 7 |
| Seasons played | — | 11 |
| Career prize money in millions | — | 2 |
| Tournament finals | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 87 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 90 |
Marcelo "coldzera" David leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Martin "Saksa" Sazdov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Saksa scores higher on longevity. coldzera leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. coldzera: 84.7, Saksa: 84.7.
Make your case for coldzera vs Saksa. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.