Who is better, coldzera or fer?
Fernando "fer" Alvarenga leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 84.7 for Marcelo "coldzera" David — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Fernando "fer" Alvarenga above Marcelo "coldzera" David: 85.4 vs 84.7. Fernando "fer" Alvarenga leads on Longevity, Honours. Marcelo "coldzera" David leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →fer wins: Longevity, Honours
coldzera wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/coldzera-vs-fer-cs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
fer leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for fer — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | coldzeraRetired · FaZe Clan | ferActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 2 | 2 |
| HLTV Player of the Year | 2 | — |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | 6 | — |
| Career rating 2.0 | 1.15 | — |
| Big event MVPs | 9 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 1.1 | — |
| Major finals | — | 2 |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 4 |
| Big event titles | — | 12 |
| Professional seasons | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 87 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Fernando "fer" Alvarenga leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 84.7 for Marcelo "coldzera" David — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
coldzera scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. fer leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. coldzera: 84.7, fer: 85.4.
Make your case for coldzera vs fer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.