Who is better, coldzera or Mata?
Marcelo "coldzera" David leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Marcelo "coldzera" David and Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong level at 84.7. Marcelo "coldzera" David leads on Statistics, Dominance. Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong leads on Longevity, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →coldzera wins: Dominance, Statistics
Mata wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/coldzera-vs-mata-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
coldzera leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Mata — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | coldzeraRetired · FaZe Clan | MataRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 2 | — |
| HLTV Player of the Year | 2 | — |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | 6 | — |
| Career rating 2.0 | 1.15 | — |
| Big event MVPs | 9 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 1.1 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| World finals MVP awards | — | 1 |
| LCK titles | — | 2 |
| LPL titles | — | 1 |
| Professional seasons | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 87 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Marcelo "coldzera" David leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mata scores higher on peak, honours, longevity. coldzera leads on dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. coldzera: 84.7, Mata: 84.7.
Make your case for coldzera vs Mata. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.