Who is better, Cowdrey or Dujon?
Colin Cowdrey leads with a GOAT score of 87.9 against 87.9 for Jeff Dujon — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cowdrey vs Dujon
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Colin Cowdrey and Jeff Dujon level at 87.9. Colin Cowdrey leads on Longevity. Jeff Dujon leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CowdreyWinner
87.9Cowdrey wins: Longevity
Dujon
87.9Dujon wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/colin-cowdrey-vs-jeff-dujon
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Colin Cowdrey
87.9
Cowdrey leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Colin Cowdrey
2. Jeff Dujon
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇯🇲 Jeff Dujon5 years played · career day 1,825281 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Colin Cowdrey5 years played · career day 1,825235 runs
-16.4% vs Dujon at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Cowdrey | 0 | 0 | 35 | 76 | 235 | 531 |
| 🇯🇲 Dujon | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 281 | 605 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cowdrey87.9
Dujon87.9
FAQ
Where does Dujon beat Cowdrey?
Dujon scores higher on honours. Cowdrey leads on longevity.
How is the Cowdrey vs Dujon score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cowdrey: 87.9, Dujon: 87.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cowdrey vs Dujon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.