GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Gregory vs McKinley

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GregoryWinner
78.2

Gregory wins: Longevity

McKinley
78.0

McKinley wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/colin-gregory-vs-chuck-mckinley

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Colin Gregory
78.2

Gregory leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories. Australian champion in 1929 and later a Wimbledon chairman.

1. Colin Gregory
78.2
2. Chuck McKinley
78.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Chuck McKinley5 seasons played · career day 2,19119 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Colin Gregory5 seasons played · career day 2,1908 titles
-57.9% vs McKinley at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Gregory0001711
🇺🇸 McKinley00021525

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGregoryRetiredMcKinleyRetired
Grand Slam singles titles11
Davis Cup ties10
Wimbledon doubles finals1
British titles4
Career span in years28
Davis Cup titles1
Grand Slam doubles titles1
Career-high ranking1
Davis Cup match wins29
Dominance w25%6674
Peak w20%8892
Longevity w20%8866
Honours w20%7478
Statistics w15%7882

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gregory78.2
McKinley78.0
The people
Gregory
McKinley

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Gregory vs McKinley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →