Who is better, Jackson or Coe?
Colin Jackson leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Sebastian Coe — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Colin Jackson and Sebastian Coe level at 87.5. Colin Jackson leads on Longevity. Sebastian Coe leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jackson wins: Longevity
Coe wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/colin-jackson-vs-sebastian-coe
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jackson leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Jackson | 0 | 0 | 62 | 134 | 392 | 758 |
| 🇬🇧 Coe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101.73 | 512.26 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JacksonRetired | CoeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship golds | 4 | — |
| World Indoor golds | 2 | — |
| World record 110 m hurdles | 12.91 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| World records | — | 12 |
| 800 m best (s) | — | 101.73 |
| 1500 m best (s) | — | 212.18 |
| European golds | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Colin Jackson leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Sebastian Coe — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Coe scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Jackson leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jackson: 87.5, Coe: 87.5.
Make your case for Jackson vs Coe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.