GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Jackson vs Lebedeva

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
JacksonWinner
87.5

Jackson wins: Longevity

Lebedeva
87.5

Lebedeva wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Athletics

Shareable URL · /compare/colin-jackson-vs-tatyana-lebedeva

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Colin Jackson
87.5

Jackson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. His 12.91 world record from 1993 stood for eleven years; twice a world champion.

1. Colin Jackson
87.5
2. Tatyana Lebedeva
87.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Major golds per season

Career timeline · Major golds per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Major golds per season
1. 🇬🇧 Colin Jackson5 seasons played · career day 1,825392 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Tatyana Lebedeva5 seasons played · career day 1,82511 major golds
-97.2% vs Jackson at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Jackson0062134392758
🇷🇺 Lebedeva00131121

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricJacksonRetiredLebedevaRetired
World Championship golds23
Olympic silver medals1
European Championship golds4
World Indoor golds2
World record 110 m hurdles12.91
Olympic gold medals1
World indoor titles4
Best triple jump in metres15.34
Best long jump in metres7.33
Dominance w25%8686
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%8884
Honours w20%8488
Statistics w15%8888

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Jackson87.5
Lebedeva87.5
The people
Jackson
Lebedeva

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Jackson vs Lebedeva. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →