Who is better, Martínez or Trabert?
Tony Trabert leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Conchita Martínez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tony Trabert above Conchita Martínez: 82.1 vs 82.0. Tony Trabert leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Conchita Martínez leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Trabert wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Martínez wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/conchita-martinez-vs-tony-trabert
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Trabert leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Martínez | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 29 |
| 🇺🇸 Trabert | 0 | 0 | 48 | 106 | 338 | 680 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MartínezRetired | TrabertRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| WTA titles | 33 | — |
| Fed Cup titles | 5 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 2 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 5 |
| Majors won in 1955 | — | 3 |
| French titles | — | 2 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Major doubles titles | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Tony Trabert leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Conchita Martínez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Martínez scores higher on statistics, longevity. Trabert leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Martínez: 82.0, Trabert: 82.1.
Make your case for Martínez vs Trabert. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.