Who is better, Pohlers or Xavi?
Conny Pohlers leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.7 for Xavi Hernández — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Conny Pohlers above Xavi Hernández: 88.8 vs 88.7. Conny Pohlers leads on Statistics, Peak. Xavi Hernández leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Pohlers wins: Peak, Statistics
Xavi wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/conny-pohlers-v-vs-xavi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pohlers leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Pohlers | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 237 | 640 |
| 🇪🇸 Xavi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 122 | 284 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PohlersRetired | XaviRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Bundesliga goals | 220 | — |
| Bundesliga titles | 7 | — |
| Bundesliga top scorer awards | 4 | — |
| Germany goals | 27 | — |
| Appearances | — | 1,045 |
| Champions League titles | — | 4 |
| League titles | — | 8 |
| World Cups | — | 1 |
| European Championships | — | 2 |
| Career assists | — | 260 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 91 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 86 |
Conny Pohlers leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.7 for Xavi Hernández — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Xavi scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Pohlers leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Pohlers: 88.8, Xavi: 88.7.
Make your case for Pohlers vs Xavi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.