Who is better, van Bentum or Meyer?
Conny van Bentum leads with a GOAT score of 84.4 against 84.4 for Debbie Meyer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Conny van Bentum and Debbie Meyer level at 84.4. Conny van Bentum leads on Longevity. Debbie Meyer leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →van Bentum wins: Longevity
Meyer wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/conny-van-bentum-vs-debbie-meyer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
van Bentum leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 van Bentum | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 244 | 668 |
| 🇺🇸 Meyer | 0 | 0 | 80 | 176 | 436 | 496 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | van BentumRetired | MeyerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 5 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Dutch titles | 20 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 3 |
| Individual Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| World records set | — | 15 |
| US national titles | — | 19 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Conny van Bentum leads with a GOAT score of 84.4 against 84.4 for Debbie Meyer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Meyer scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. van Bentum leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. van Bentum: 84.4, Meyer: 84.4.
Make your case for van Bentum vs Meyer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.