Who is better, van Bentum or Meilutytė?
Rūta Meilutytė leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.4 for Conny van Bentum — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Rūta Meilutytė above Conny van Bentum: 84.7 vs 84.4. Rūta Meilutytė leads on Peak, Dominance. Conny van Bentum leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Meilutytė wins: Dominance, Peak
van Bentum wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/conny-van-bentum-vs-ruta-meilutyte
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Meilutytė leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 van Bentum | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 244 | 668 |
| 🇱🇹 Meilutytė | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 13 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | van BentumRetired | MeilutytėActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 5 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Dutch titles | 20 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship golds | — | 4 |
| World records | — | 5 |
| European Championship golds | — | 6 |
| Age at Olympic title | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Rūta Meilutytė leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.4 for Conny van Bentum — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
van Bentum scores higher on honours, statistics, longevity. Meilutytė leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. van Bentum: 84.4, Meilutytė: 84.7.
Make your case for van Bentum vs Meilutytė. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.