Who is better, Balmy or Carter?
Coralie Balmy leads with a GOAT score of 76.1 against 76.0 for James Carter — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Coralie Balmy above James Carter: 76.1 vs 76.0. Coralie Balmy leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance. James Carter leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Balmy wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Carter wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/coralie-balmy-vs-james-carter-swimmer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Balmy leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Balmy | 0 | 0 | 48 | 106 | 252 | 678 |
| 🇺🇸 Carter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 23 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BalmyRetired | CarterRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| French records set | 8 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Short-course world titles | — | 1 |
| Pan Pacific medals | — | 2 |
| US national titles | — | 3 |
| Career span in years | — | 10 |
| 200 m backstroke best | — | 118 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 84 |
Coralie Balmy leads with a GOAT score of 76.1 against 76.0 for James Carter — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carter scores higher on peak, statistics. Balmy leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Balmy: 76.1, Carter: 76.0.
Make your case for Balmy vs Carter. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.