Who is better, Walsh or Taylor?
Ross Taylor leads with a GOAT score of 88.1 against 88.0 for Courtney Walsh — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ross Taylor above Courtney Walsh: 88.1 vs 88.0. Ross Taylor leads on Statistics, Peak. Courtney Walsh leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Taylor wins: Peak, Statistics
Walsh wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/courtney-walsh-vs-ross-taylor
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Taylor leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇲 Walsh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 157 |
| 🇳🇿 Taylor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 158 | 404 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WalshRetired | TaylorRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 519 | — |
| Tests played | 132 | — |
| ODI wickets | 227 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls | 22 | — |
| Test bowling average | 24.44 | — |
| World Test Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Test runs | — | 7,683 |
| ODI runs | — | 8,607 |
| International centuries | — | 40 |
| ODI matches | — | 236 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 96 |
Ross Taylor leads with a GOAT score of 88.1 against 88.0 for Courtney Walsh — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Walsh scores higher on dominance, honours. Taylor leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Walsh: 88.0, Taylor: 88.1.
Make your case for Walsh vs Taylor. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.