GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Walsh vs Boult

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

Quick answer

GOAT Rank currently scores Courtney Walsh and Trent Boult level at 88.0. Courtney Walsh leads on Longevity. Trent Boult leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.

How the GOAT Score is calculated →
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WalshWinner
88.0

Walsh wins: Longevity

Boult
88.0

Boult wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/courtney-walsh-vs-trent-boult

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇲 Courtney Walsh
88.0

Walsh leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Courtney Walsh
88.0
2. Trent Boult
88.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇳🇿 Trent Boult5 years played · career day 2,191158 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇲 Courtney Walsh5 years played · career day 2,921119 runs
-24.7% vs Boult at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇲 Walsh000030157
🇳🇿 Boult00018116278

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricWalshRetiredBoultActive · Mumbai Indians
Test wickets519317
Tests played132—
ODI wickets227211
Five-wicket hauls2210
Test bowling average24.4427.5
World Test Championship titles—1
Dominance w25%8486
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%9282
Honours w20%8486
Statistics w15%9294

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Walsh88.0
Boult88.0
The people
Walsh
Boult

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Walsh or Boult?

Courtney Walsh leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 88.0 for Trent Boult — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Boult beat Walsh?

Boult scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Walsh leads on longevity.

How is the Walsh vs Boult score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Walsh: 88.0, Boult: 88.0.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Walsh vs Boult. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →