Who is better, Walsh or Boult?
Courtney Walsh leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 88.0 for Trent Boult — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Courtney Walsh and Trent Boult level at 88.0. Courtney Walsh leads on Longevity. Trent Boult leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Walsh wins: Longevity
Boult wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/courtney-walsh-vs-trent-boult
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Walsh leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇲 Walsh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 157 |
| 🇳🇿 Boult | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 116 | 278 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Courtney Walsh leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 88.0 for Trent Boult — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boult scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Walsh leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Walsh: 88.0, Boult: 88.0.
Make your case for Walsh vs Boult. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.