AthletesTeams
Cr1t- vs Jame
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Cr1t-Winner
83.3Cr1t- wins: Longevity, Honours
Jame
83.1Jame wins: Peak, Statistics
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇰 Cr1t-
83.3
Cr1t- leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Major champion support with OG and Evil Geniuses.
1. Cr1t-
2. Dzhami "Jame" Ali
Category breakdown
Season form · Trophies per season
Career timeline · Trophies per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Trophies per season1. 🇩🇰 Cr1t-5 split years played · career day 1,825338 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Dzhami "Jame" Ali5 split years played · career day 2,1915.6 trophies
-98.3% vs Cr1t- at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Cr1t- | 0 | 0 | 52 | 112 | 338 | 680 |
| 🇷🇺 Jame | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.08 | 3.32 | 8.9 |
Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.
| Metric | Cr1t-Active | JameActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 3 | — |
| TI appearances | 7 | — |
| TI top-four finishes | 2 | — |
| Premier tournament wins | 8 | — |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 2 | — |
| Big events won | — | 8 |
| Top-20 player rankings | — | 3 |
| Major playoff appearances | — | 3 |
| Career rating | — | 1.12 |
| MVP medals | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 87 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 90 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cr1t-83.3
Jame83.1
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cr1t- vs Jame. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.