Who is better, Cr1t- or Ksharp?
Cr1t- leads with a GOAT score of 83.3 against 83.2 for Ksharp — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cr1t- above Ksharp: 83.3 vs 83.2. Cr1t- leads on Longevity. Ksharp leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cr1t- wins: Longevity
Ksharp wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cr1t- leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Cr1t- | 0 | 0 | 52 | 112 | 338 | 680 |
| 🇺🇸 Ksharp | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 383 | 498 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Cr1t-Active | KsharpRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 3 | — |
| TI appearances | 7 | — |
| TI top-four finishes | 2 | — |
| Premier tournament wins | 8 | 12 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 2 | — |
| World championship titles | — | 2 |
| CPL titles | — | 5 |
| Seasons active | — | 7 |
| World Cyber Games medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 87 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Cr1t- leads with a GOAT score of 83.3 against 83.2 for Ksharp — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ksharp scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Cr1t- leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cr1t-: 83.3, Ksharp: 83.2.
Make your case for Cr1t- vs Ksharp. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.