Who is better, Beardsley or Baltrusch?
Craig Beardsley leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.4 for Frank Baltrusch — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Craig Beardsley above Frank Baltrusch: 80.5 vs 80.4. Craig Beardsley leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Frank Baltrusch leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Beardsley wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Baltrusch wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/craig-beardsley-vs-frank-baltrusch
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Beardsley leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Beardsley | 0 | 0 | 50 | 124 | 373 | 428 |
| 🇩🇪 Baltrusch | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 366 | 472 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BeardsleyRetired | BaltruschRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World records set | 2 | — |
| Pan American titles | 1 | — |
| US titles | 5 | — |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| World ranking number ones | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| European Championship medals | — | 2 |
| National titles | — | 6 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| National records set | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 64 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Craig Beardsley leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.4 for Frank Baltrusch — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baltrusch scores higher on honours, longevity. Beardsley leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beardsley: 80.5, Baltrusch: 80.4.
Make your case for Beardsley vs Baltrusch. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.