Who is better, Beardsley or Ohashi?
Yui Ohashi leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.5 for Craig Beardsley — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yui Ohashi above Craig Beardsley: 80.7 vs 80.5. Yui Ohashi leads on Longevity, Honours. Craig Beardsley leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ohashi wins: Longevity, Honours
Beardsley wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/craig-beardsley-vs-yui-ohashi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ohashi leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Beardsley | 0 | 0 | 50 | 124 | 373 | 428 |
| 🇯🇵 Ohashi | 0 | 0 | 60 | 130 | 378 | 718 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BeardsleyRetired | OhashiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World records set | 2 | — |
| Pan American titles | 1 | — |
| US titles | 5 | — |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| World ranking number ones | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Asian Games golds | — | 2 |
| Japanese national records | — | 2 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 64 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 80 |
Yui Ohashi leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.5 for Craig Beardsley — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Beardsley scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Ohashi leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beardsley: 80.5, Ohashi: 80.7.
Make your case for Beardsley vs Ohashi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.