Who is better, Cruyff or van der Sar?
Johan Cruyff leads with a GOAT score of 92.9 against 90.8 for Edwin van der Sar — a gap of 2.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Johan Cruyff above Edwin van der Sar: 92.9 vs 90.8. Johan Cruyff leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Edwin van der Sar leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cruyff wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
van der Sar wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/cruyff-vs-edwin-van-der-sar
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cruyff leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Cruyff — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | CruyffRetired | van der SarRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career goals | 401 | — |
| Ballon d'Or | 3 | — |
| European Cups | 3 | — |
| League titles | 9 | — |
| International caps | 48 | — |
| International goals | 33 | — |
| League appearances | — | 606 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| Netherlands caps | — | 130 |
| Premier League titles | — | 4 |
| Eredivisie titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 95 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 93 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Johan Cruyff leads with a GOAT score of 92.9 against 90.8 for Edwin van der Sar — a gap of 2.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
van der Sar scores higher on longevity. Cruyff leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cruyff: 92.9, van der Sar: 90.8.
Make your case for Cruyff vs van der Sar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.