Who is better, JT or s1mple?
Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 19.7 for JT — a gap of 72.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev above JT: 91.9 vs 19.7. Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →s1mple wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
JT wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/cs-jt-vs-s1mple
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
s1mple leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
JT — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for JT — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | JTActive · Liquid | s1mpleActive · Falcons (stand-in) |
|---|---|---|
| Team world rank | 17 | — |
| Team rank points | 1,465 | — |
| Regional rank | 4 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| HLTV Player of the Year | — | 2 |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 8 |
| Career rating 2.0 | — | 1.24 |
| Big event MVPs | — | 21 |
| Career prize money (M$) | — | 1.9 |
| Dominance w25% | 21.6 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 23.1 | 99 |
| Longevity w20% | 17.2 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 15.9 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 20.2 | 97 |
Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 19.7 for JT — a gap of 72.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
JT does not lead any of the five categories; s1mple is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. JT: 19.7, s1mple: 91.9.
Make your case for JT vs s1mple. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.