Who is better, kyousuke or EliGE?
Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski leads with a GOAT score of 90.9 against 25.9 for kyousuke — a gap of 65.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski above kyousuke: 90.9 vs 25.9. Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski leads on Longevity, Statistics, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →EliGE wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
kyousuke wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/cs-kyousuke-vs-es-elige
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
EliGE leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
kyousuke — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇺 kyousuke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77.7 |
| 🇺🇸 EliGE | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 329 | 700 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | kyousukeActive · Falcons | EliGEActive |
|---|---|---|
| Team world rank | 3 | — |
| Team rank points | 1,881 | — |
| Regional rank | 3 | — |
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | — | 1 |
| Big tournament titles | — | 24 |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 6 |
| Seasons played | — | 13 |
| Dominance w25% | 27.8 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 29.6 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 19.3 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 26.4 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 25.9 | 94 |
Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski leads with a GOAT score of 90.9 against 25.9 for kyousuke — a gap of 65.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
kyousuke does not lead any of the five categories; EliGE is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. kyousuke: 25.9, EliGE: 90.9.
Make your case for kyousuke vs EliGE. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.