Who is better, molodoy or Flash?
Lee "Flash" Young-ho leads with a GOAT score of 91.3 against 23.1 for molodoy — a gap of 68.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lee "Flash" Young-ho above molodoy: 91.3 vs 23.1. Lee "Flash" Young-ho leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Flash wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
molodoy wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/cs-molodoy-vs-flash
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Flash leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
molodoy — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for molodoy — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | molodoyActive · FURIA | FlashRetired · KT / Afreeca era |
|---|---|---|
| Team world rank | 7 | — |
| Team rank points | 1,754 | — |
| Regional rank | 2 | — |
| Individual league titles | — | 7 |
| Career win rate | — | 73.6% |
| Premier finals | — | 12 |
| Team league titles | — | 6 |
| Pro seasons | — | 10 |
| Career prize money (M$) | — | 0.5 |
| Dominance w25% | 25.9 | 97 |
| Peak w20% | 27.6 | 98 |
| Longevity w20% | 18.6 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 19 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 24.2 | 95 |
Lee "Flash" Young-ho leads with a GOAT score of 91.3 against 23.1 for molodoy — a gap of 68.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
molodoy does not lead any of the five categories; Flash is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. molodoy: 23.1, Flash: 91.3.
Make your case for molodoy vs Flash. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.