Who is better, tN1R or s1mple?
Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 26.5 for tN1R — a gap of 65.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev above tN1R: 91.9 vs 26.5. Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →s1mple wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
tN1R wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/cs-tn1r-vs-s1mple
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
s1mple leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
tN1R — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for tN1R — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | tN1RActive · Spirit | s1mpleActive · Falcons (stand-in) |
|---|---|---|
| Team world rank | 1 | — |
| Team rank points | 2,031 | — |
| Regional rank | 1 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| HLTV Player of the Year | — | 2 |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 8 |
| Career rating 2.0 | — | 1.24 |
| Big event MVPs | — | 21 |
| Career prize money (M$) | — | 1.9 |
| Dominance w25% | 30 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 32 | 99 |
| Longevity w20% | 20 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 22 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 28 | 97 |
Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 26.5 for tN1R — a gap of 65.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
tN1R does not lead any of the five categories; s1mple is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. tN1R: 26.5, s1mple: 91.9.
Make your case for tN1R vs s1mple. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.