Who is better, Lambeau or Groza?
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 92.3 for Curly Lambeau — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lou Groza above Curly Lambeau: 92.4 vs 92.3. Lou Groza leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Curly Lambeau leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Groza wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Lambeau wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/curly-lambeau-vs-lou-groza
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Groza leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Lambeau — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Lambeau | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 43 |
| 🇺🇸 Groza | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 308 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LambeauRetired | GrozaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NFL championships | 6 | — |
| Career coaching wins | 229 | — |
| Seasons as head coach | 33 | — |
| Franchises founded | 1 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| League titles | — | 8 |
| Career points | — | 1,608 |
| Pro Bowls | — | 9 |
| Seasons played | — | 21 |
| Field goals made | — | 264 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 98 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 92.3 for Curly Lambeau — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lambeau scores higher on peak, dominance. Groza leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lambeau: 92.3, Groza: 92.4.
Make your case for Lambeau vs Groza. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.