Who is better, Lambeau or Ward?
Curly Lambeau leads with a GOAT score of 92.3 against 14.8 for Denzel Ward — a gap of 77.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Lambeau vs Ward
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LambeauWinner
92.3Lambeau wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Ward
14.8Ward wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/curly-lambeau-vs-ros-denzel-ward
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Curly Lambeau
92.3
Lambeau leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Ward — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Curly Lambeau
2. Denzel Ward
Category breakdown
Season form · Touchdowns per season
Career timeline · Touchdowns per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season1. 🏳️ Denzel Ward5 seasons played · career day 1,825239 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Curly Lambeau5 seasons played · career day 2,55629 touchdowns
-87.9% vs Ward at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Lambeau | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 43 |
| 🏳️ Ward | 0 | 0 | 53 | 97 | 239 | 361 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Lambeau92.3
Ward14.8
FAQ
Where does Ward beat Lambeau?
Ward does not lead any of the five categories; Lambeau is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Lambeau vs Ward score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lambeau: 92.3, Ward: 14.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Lambeau vs Ward. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.