Who is better, Cokes or Fullmer?
Curtis Cokes leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.1 for Gene Fullmer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cokes vs Fullmer
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Curtis Cokes and Gene Fullmer level at 86.1. Curtis Cokes leads on Longevity. Gene Fullmer leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CokesWinner
86.1Cokes wins: Longevity
Fullmer
86.1Fullmer wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/curtis-cokes-vs-gene-fullmer
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Curtis Cokes
86.1
Cokes leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Curtis Cokes
2. Gene Fullmer
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Gene Fullmer5 years played · career day 1,825298 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Curtis Cokes5 years played · career day 1,825282 title wins
-5.4% vs Fullmer at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cokes | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 282 | 609 |
| 🇺🇸 Fullmer | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 298 | 647 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cokes86.1
Fullmer86.1
FAQ
Where does Fullmer beat Cokes?
Fullmer scores higher on honours. Cokes leads on longevity.
How is the Cokes vs Fullmer score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cokes: 86.1, Fullmer: 86.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cokes vs Fullmer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.