Who is better, Ambrose or Warne?
Curtly Ambrose leads with a GOAT score of 90.7 against 90.7 for Shane Warne — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Ambrose vs Warne
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Curtly Ambrose and Shane Warne level at 90.7. Curtly Ambrose leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Shane Warne leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AmbroseWinner
90.7Ambrose wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Warne
90.7Warne wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/curtly-ambrose-vs-shane-warne
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇬 Curtly Ambrose
90.7
Ambrose leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Curtly Ambrose
2. Shane Warne
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇬 Curtly Ambrose5 years played · career day 1,826283 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Shane Warne5 years played · career day 2,556275 runs
-2.8% vs Ambrose at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇬 Ambrose | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 210 | 638 |
| 🇦🇺 Warne | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 169 | 373 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ambrose90.7
Warne90.7
FAQ
Where does Warne beat Ambrose?
Warne scores higher on longevity. Ambrose leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Ambrose vs Warne score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ambrose: 90.7, Warne: 90.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Ambrose vs Warne. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.