Who is better, Burnup or Austin?
Cuthbert Burnup leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 81.0 for Ian Austin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Cuthbert Burnup and Ian Austin level at 81.0. Cuthbert Burnup leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Ian Austin leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Burnup wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Austin wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/cuthbert-burnup-vs-ian-austin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Burnup leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Burnup | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 285 | 621 |
| 🇬🇧 Austin | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 294 | 610 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BurnupRetired | AustinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class runs | 13,614 | 4,000 |
| First-class centuries | 30 | — |
| County championships won | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 13 | — |
| Highest score | 200 | — |
| ODI appearances | — | 9 |
| First-class wickets | — | 267 |
| List A wickets | — | 340 |
| Lord's one-day finals won | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Cuthbert Burnup leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 81.0 for Ian Austin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Austin scores higher on honours, longevity. Burnup leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burnup: 81.0, Austin: 81.0.
Make your case for Burnup vs Austin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.