Who is better, Denneny or Duggan?
Cy Denneny leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Meghan Duggan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Denneny vs Duggan
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Cy Denneny and Meghan Duggan level at 85.5. Cy Denneny leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Meghan Duggan leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DennenyWinner
85.5Denneny wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Duggan
85.5Duggan wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/cy-denneny-vs-meghan-duggan
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Cy Denneny
85.5
Denneny leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Cy Denneny
2. Meghan Duggan
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Cy Denneny5 seasons played · career day 1,825357 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Meghan Duggan5 seasons played · career day 2,191124 points
-65.3% vs Denneny at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Denneny | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 357 | 693 |
| 🇺🇸 Duggan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 96 | 200 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Denneny85.5
Duggan85.5
FAQ
Where does Duggan beat Denneny?
Duggan scores higher on longevity. Denneny leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Denneny vs Duggan score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Denneny: 85.5, Duggan: 85.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Denneny vs Duggan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.