Who is better, Cooper or Meneghin?
Cynthia Cooper-Dyke leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 88.7 for Dino Meneghin — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cynthia Cooper-Dyke above Dino Meneghin: 89.1 vs 88.7. Cynthia Cooper-Dyke leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Dino Meneghin leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cooper wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Meneghin wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/cynthia-cooper-dyke-vs-dino-meneghin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cooper leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cooper | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 293 | 607 |
| 🇮🇹 Meneghin | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 288 | 586 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CooperRetired | MeneghinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| WNBA titles | 4 | — |
| WNBA Finals MVP awards | 4 | — |
| WNBA MVP awards | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| WNBA points per game | 21 | — |
| EuroLeague titles | — | 7 |
| Italian league titles | — | 12 |
| European Championship golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Seasons played | — | 28 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Cynthia Cooper-Dyke leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 88.7 for Dino Meneghin — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Meneghin scores higher on longevity. Cooper leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cooper: 89.1, Meneghin: 88.7.
Make your case for Cooper vs Meneghin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.