Who is better, Cooper or Karl Malone?
Karl Malone leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 89.1 for Cynthia Cooper-Dyke — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Karl Malone above Cynthia Cooper-Dyke: 89.2 vs 89.1. Karl Malone leads on Longevity, Statistics. Cynthia Cooper-Dyke leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Karl Malone wins: Longevity, Statistics
Cooper wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/cynthia-cooper-dyke-vs-karl-malone
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Karl Malone leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cooper | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 293 | 607 |
| 🇺🇸 Karl Malone | 0 | 0 | 14.9 | 36.6 | 124.4 | 233.6 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CooperRetired | Karl MaloneRetired |
|---|---|---|
| WNBA titles | 4 | — |
| WNBA Finals MVP awards | 4 | — |
| WNBA MVP awards | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| WNBA points per game | 21 | — |
| MVP awards | — | 2 |
| All-Star selections | — | 14 |
| Career points | — | 36,928 |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| Career rebounds | — | 14,968 |
| Finals appearances | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Karl Malone leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 89.1 for Cynthia Cooper-Dyke — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Cooper scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Karl Malone leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cooper: 89.1, Karl Malone: 89.2.
Make your case for Cooper vs Karl Malone. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.