Who is better, Seto or Brembilla?
Emiliano Brembilla leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.7 for Daiya Seto — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Emiliano Brembilla above Daiya Seto: 82.8 vs 82.7. Emiliano Brembilla leads on Statistics, Longevity. Daiya Seto leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brembilla wins: Longevity, Statistics
Seto wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/daiya-seto-vs-emiliano-brembilla
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brembilla leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Seto | 0 | 0 | 64 | 152 | 318 | 754 |
| 🇮🇹 Brembilla | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 689.5 | 1,597.8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SetoActive | BrembillaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 5 | — |
| Short course world titles | 8 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Asian Games golds | 3 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| World short-course golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic Games | — | 4 |
| 400 m freestyle best | — | 226.7 |
| Italian records | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 90 |
Emiliano Brembilla leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.7 for Daiya Seto — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Seto scores higher on dominance, honours. Brembilla leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Seto: 82.7, Brembilla: 82.8.
Make your case for Seto vs Brembilla. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.