Who is better, Benkenstein or Booth?
Dale Benkenstein leads with a GOAT score of 80.0 against 79.5 for Major Booth — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dale Benkenstein above Major Booth: 80.0 vs 79.5. Dale Benkenstein leads on Longevity. Major Booth leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Benkenstein wins: Longevity
Booth wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/dale-benkenstein-vs-major-booth
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Benkenstein leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 Benkenstein | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 265 | 549 |
| 🇬🇧 Booth | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 252 | 479 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BenkensteinRetired | BoothRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class runs | 17,000 | 4,753 |
| First-class centuries | 40 | — |
| One-day international matches | 23 | — |
| Domestic titles as captain | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 22 | — |
| Test appearances | — | 2 |
| First-class wickets | — | 603 |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Year | — | 1 |
| Seasons with 100 wickets | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Dale Benkenstein leads with a GOAT score of 80.0 against 79.5 for Major Booth — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Booth scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Benkenstein leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Benkenstein: 80.0, Booth: 79.5.
Make your case for Benkenstein vs Booth. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.