Who is better, Lillard or Wang?
Wang Zhizhi leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.7 for Damian Lillard — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wang Zhizhi above Damian Lillard: 78.9 vs 78.7. Wang Zhizhi leads on Longevity, Honours. Damian Lillard leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wang wins: Longevity, Honours
Lillard wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/damian-lillard-vs-wang-zhizhi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wang leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Lillard | 0 | 0 | 19 | 39.7 | 85.8 | 224.3 |
| 🇨🇳 Wang | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 674 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LillardActive · Portland Trail Blazers | WangRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 9 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| All-NBA selections | 7 | — |
| Career points per game | 25.1 | — |
| Career three-pointers | 2,600 | — |
| CBA championships | — | 8 |
| Asian Championship golds | — | 4 |
| NBA seasons | — | 5 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 4 |
| CBA Finals MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 78 |
Wang Zhizhi leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.7 for Damian Lillard — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lillard scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Wang leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lillard: 78.7, Wang: 78.9.
Make your case for Lillard vs Wang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.