Who is better, Fouts or Biletnikoff?
Dan Fouts leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.8 for Fred Biletnikoff — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dan Fouts and Fred Biletnikoff level at 86.8. Dan Fouts leads on Dominance, Longevity, Statistics. Fred Biletnikoff leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fouts wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Biletnikoff wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/dan-fouts-vs-fred-biletnikoff
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fouts leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Fouts | 0 | 0 | 35 | 79 | 261 | 607 |
| 🇺🇸 Biletnikoff | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 289 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FoutsRetired | BiletnikoffRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Passing yards | 43,040 | — |
| Passing touchdowns | 254 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 6 | 6 |
| Seasons leading the league in passing | 4 | — |
| Seasons played | 15 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 1 |
| Super Bowl MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Career receptions | — | 589 |
| Receiving yards | — | 8,974 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Dan Fouts leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.8 for Fred Biletnikoff — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Biletnikoff scores higher on honours. Fouts leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fouts: 86.8, Biletnikoff: 86.8.
Make your case for Fouts vs Biletnikoff. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.