Who is better, Fouts or Law?
Dan Fouts leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.8 for Ty Law — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Fouts vs Law
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dan Fouts and Ty Law level at 86.8. Dan Fouts leads on Dominance, Longevity, Statistics. Ty Law leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FoutsWinner
86.8Fouts wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Law
86.8Law wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/dan-fouts-vs-ty-law
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Dan Fouts
86.8
Fouts leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Dan Fouts
2. Ty Law
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Dan Fouts5 seasons played · career day 1,825261 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Ty Law5 seasons played · career day 1,82518 touchdowns
-93.1% vs Fouts at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Fouts | 0 | 0 | 35 | 79 | 261 | 607 |
| 🇺🇸 Law | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 33 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Fouts86.8
Law86.8
FAQ
Where does Law beat Fouts?
Law scores higher on honours. Fouts leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
How is the Fouts vs Law score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fouts: 86.8, Law: 86.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Fouts vs Law. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.