GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Gurney vs Rathmann

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RathmannWinner
79.1

Rathmann wins: Peak, Longevity

Gurney
78.9

Gurney wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Formula 1

Shareable URL · /compare/dan-gurney-vs-jim-rathmann

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jim Rathmann
79.1

Rathmann leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Won the 1960 Indianapolis 500 after three runner-up finishes.

1. Jim Rathmann
79.1
2. Dan Gurney
78.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Race wins per season

Career timeline · Race wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Race wins per season
1. 🇺🇸 Jim Rathmann5 seasons played · career day 2,1908 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Dan Gurney5 seasons played · career day 1,8256 race wins
-25.0% vs Rathmann at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Gurney0012612
🇺🇸 Rathmann0000614

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGurneyRetiredRathmannRetired
Grand Prix wins4
Podiums19
Pole positions3
Le Mans wins1
Constructor wins as builder1
Indianapolis 500 wins1
Indianapolis 500 runner-up finishes3
Indy 500 starts14
Career championship points30
Career span in years15
Dominance w25%7672
Peak w20%8692
Longevity w20%7680
Honours w20%7672
Statistics w15%8282

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Rathmann79.1
Gurney78.9
The people
Gurney
Rathmann

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Gurney vs Rathmann. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →