Who is better, Gurney or Rindt?
Dan Gurney leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.4 for Jochen Rindt — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Gurney vs Rindt
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dan Gurney above Jochen Rindt: 78.9 vs 78.4. Dan Gurney leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jochen Rindt leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GurneyWinner
78.9Gurney wins: Longevity, Statistics
Rindt
78.4Rindt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to Formula 1Shareable URL · /compare/dan-gurney-vs-jochen-rindt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Dan Gurney
78.9
Gurney leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Dan Gurney
2. Jochen Rindt
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Dan Gurney5 seasons played · career day 1,8256 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇹 Jochen Rindt5 seasons played · career day 2,1910 race wins
-100.0% vs Gurney at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Gurney | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| 🇦🇹 Rindt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Gurney78.9
Rindt78.4
FAQ
Where does Rindt beat Gurney?
Rindt scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Gurney leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the Gurney vs Rindt score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gurney: 78.9, Rindt: 78.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gurney vs Rindt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.