Who is better, O'Brien or Antyukh?
Dan O'Brien leads with a GOAT score of 85.1 against 85.1 for Natalya Antyukh — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dan O'Brien and Natalya Antyukh level at 85.1. Dan O'Brien leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Natalya Antyukh leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →O'Brien wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Antyukh wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/dan-obrien-vs-natalya-antyukh
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
O'Brien leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 O'Brien | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17,170 | 61,099 |
| 🇷🇺 Antyukh | 0 | 0 | 40 | 85 | 250 | 543 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | O'BrienRetired | AntyukhRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | 3 | — |
| World records | 1 | — |
| Best score (points) | 8,891 | — |
| US titles | 7 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| European Championship titles | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Personal best in seconds | — | 5,270 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Dan O'Brien leads with a GOAT score of 85.1 against 85.1 for Natalya Antyukh — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Antyukh scores higher on longevity. O'Brien leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. O'Brien: 85.1, Antyukh: 85.1.
Make your case for O'Brien vs Antyukh. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.