Who is better, Waern or Barber?
Dan Waern leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.8 for Mikele Barber — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dan Waern above Mikele Barber: 82.9 vs 82.8. Dan Waern leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Mikele Barber leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Waern wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Barber wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/dan-waern-vs-mikele-barber
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Waern leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Waern | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 327 | 579 |
| 🇺🇸 Barber | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 336 | 660 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WaernRetired | BarberRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World records set | 2 | — |
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Swedish titles | 8 | — |
| Mile personal best in seconds | 2,374 | — |
| Sub-four-minute miles | 5 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Personal best (400m) | — | 50.33 |
| United States national medals | — | 4 |
| World indoor medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Dan Waern leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.8 for Mikele Barber — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Barber scores higher on honours, longevity. Waern leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Waern: 82.9, Barber: 82.8.
Make your case for Waern vs Barber. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.