Who is better, Waern or Belevskaya?
Dan Waern leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.9 for Yelena Belevskaya — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dan Waern and Yelena Belevskaya level at 82.9. Dan Waern leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Yelena Belevskaya leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Waern wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Belevskaya wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/dan-waern-vs-yelena-belevskaya
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Waern leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Waern | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 327 | 579 |
| 🇧🇾 Belevskaya | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 296 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WaernRetired | BelevskayaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World records set | 2 | — |
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Swedish titles | 8 | — |
| Mile personal best in seconds | 2,374 | — |
| Sub-four-minute miles | 5 | — |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 714 |
| European Indoor medals | — | 2 |
| National titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Dan Waern leads with a GOAT score of 82.9 against 82.9 for Yelena Belevskaya — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Belevskaya scores higher on honours, longevity. Waern leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Waern: 82.9, Belevskaya: 82.9.
Make your case for Waern vs Belevskaya. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.