Who is better, Alfredsson or McNamara?
George McNamara leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.3 for Daniel Alfredsson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks George McNamara above Daniel Alfredsson: 80.5 vs 80.3. George McNamara leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance. Daniel Alfredsson leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →McNamara wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Alfredsson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/daniel-alfredsson-vs-george-mcnamara
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McNamara leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Alfredsson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 235 | 506 |
| 🇨🇦 McNamara | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 320 | 642 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlfredssonRetired | McNamaraRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NHL points | 1,157 | — |
| NHL goals | 444 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Calder Trophy | 1 | — |
| Seasons as captain | 14 | — |
| Playoff points | 100 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 1 |
| Seasons played | — | 10 |
| Games played | — | 132 |
| Career goals | — | 55 |
| Allan Cup titles as builder | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
George McNamara leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.3 for Daniel Alfredsson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Alfredsson scores higher on statistics, longevity. McNamara leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alfredsson: 80.3, McNamara: 80.5.
Make your case for Alfredsson vs McNamara. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.