Who is better, Alfredsson or Dutton?
Red Dutton leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.3 for Daniel Alfredsson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Red Dutton above Daniel Alfredsson: 80.5 vs 80.3. Red Dutton leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance. Daniel Alfredsson leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Dutton wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Alfredsson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/daniel-alfredsson-vs-red-dutton
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Dutton leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Alfredsson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 235 | 506 |
| 🇨🇦 Dutton | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlfredssonRetired | DuttonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NHL points | 1,157 | 136 |
| NHL goals | 444 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Calder Trophy | 1 | — |
| Seasons as captain | 14 | — |
| Playoff points | 100 | — |
| NHL games | — | 449 |
| Penalty minutes | — | 871 |
| Professional seasons | — | 11 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Red Dutton leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.3 for Daniel Alfredsson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Alfredsson scores higher on statistics, longevity. Dutton leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alfredsson: 80.3, Dutton: 80.5.
Make your case for Alfredsson vs Dutton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.