Who is better, Alfredsson or Hooper?
Daniel Alfredsson leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.2 for Tom Hooper — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Daniel Alfredsson above Tom Hooper: 80.3 vs 80.2. Daniel Alfredsson leads on Longevity, Statistics. Tom Hooper leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Alfredsson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Hooper wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/daniel-alfredsson-vs-tom-hooper
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Alfredsson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Alfredsson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 235 | 506 |
| 🇨🇦 Hooper | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 373 | 488 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlfredssonRetired | HooperRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NHL points | 1,157 | — |
| NHL goals | 444 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Calder Trophy | 1 | — |
| Seasons as captain | 14 | — |
| Playoff points | 100 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 2 |
| Career goals | — | 40 |
| Games played | — | 41 |
| Seasons played | — | 7 |
| Cup-winning clubs | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Daniel Alfredsson leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.2 for Tom Hooper — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hooper scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Alfredsson leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alfredsson: 80.3, Hooper: 80.2.
Make your case for Alfredsson vs Hooper. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.