Who is better, D. Andersson or Messi?
Lionel Messi leads with a GOAT score of 97.0 against 29.8 for Daniel Andersson — a gap of 67.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lionel Messi above Daniel Andersson: 97.0 vs 29.8. Lionel Messi leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Messi wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
D. Andersson wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/daniel-andersson-vs-messi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Messi leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
D. Andersson is -84.8% behind Messi's pace at age 21
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | D. AnderssonRetired · Bari / Venezia / Bologna | MessiActive · Inter Miami CF |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden caps | 74 | — |
| League titles | 2 | 12 |
| Serie A seasons | 6 | — |
| MFF appearances | 233 | — |
| Major tournaments | 4 | — |
| Seasons as captain | 5 | — |
| Career goals | — | 879 |
| Career assists | — | 383 |
| Ballon d'Or | — | 8 |
| World Cups | — | 1 |
| Champions League titles | — | 4 |
| Goals per 90 | — | 0.79 |
| Dominance w25% | 24 | 98 |
| Peak w20% | 34 | 99 |
| Longevity w20% | 44 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 20 | 97 |
| Statistics w15% | 28 | 99 |
Lionel Messi leads with a GOAT score of 97.0 against 29.8 for Daniel Andersson — a gap of 67.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
D. Andersson does not lead any of the five categories; Messi is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. D. Andersson: 29.8, Messi: 97.0.
Make your case for D. Andersson vs Messi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.