Who is better, Komen or Ennis-Hill?
Daniel Komen leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 85.0 for Jessica Ennis-Hill — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Daniel Komen and Jessica Ennis-Hill level at 85.0. Daniel Komen leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Jessica Ennis-Hill leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Komen wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Ennis-Hill wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/daniel-komen-vs-jessica-ennis-hill
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Komen leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇪 Komen | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 17 |
| 🇬🇧 Ennis-Hill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19,717 | 40,285 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KomenRetired | Ennis-HillRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 1 | 3 |
| World indoor titles | 1 | — |
| World records | 4 | — |
| 3000 m world record | 7.2 | — |
| Two miles world record | 7.58 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| European golds | — | 1 |
| Best score (points) | — | 6,955 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Daniel Komen leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 85.0 for Jessica Ennis-Hill — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ennis-Hill scores higher on honours, longevity. Komen leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Komen: 85.0, Ennis-Hill: 85.0.
Make your case for Komen vs Ennis-Hill. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.