Who is better, Komen or Noguchi?
Daniel Komen leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 85.0 for Mizuki Noguchi — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Daniel Komen and Mizuki Noguchi level at 85.0. Daniel Komen leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Mizuki Noguchi leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Komen wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Noguchi wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/daniel-komen-vs-mizuki-noguchi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Komen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇪 Komen | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 17 |
| 🇯🇵 Noguchi | 0 | 0 | 40 | 92 | 316 | 654 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KomenRetired | NoguchiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 1 | — |
| World indoor titles | 1 | — |
| World records | 4 | — |
| 3000 m world record | 7.2 | — |
| Two miles world record | 7.58 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Marathon personal best in seconds | — | 7,740 |
| Major marathon wins | — | 3 |
| Asian records set | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Daniel Komen leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 85.0 for Mizuki Noguchi — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Noguchi scores higher on longevity. Komen leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Komen: 85.0, Noguchi: 85.0.
Make your case for Komen vs Noguchi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.