Who is better, D. Sedin or Laviolette?
Daniel Sedin leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Jack Laviolette — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Daniel Sedin and Jack Laviolette level at 83.0. Daniel Sedin leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jack Laviolette leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →D. Sedin wins: Longevity, Statistics
Laviolette wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/daniel-sedin-vs-jack-laviolette
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
D. Sedin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 D. Sedin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 264 |
| 🇨🇦 Laviolette | 0 | 0 | 52 | 110 | 242 | 662 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | D. SedinRetired | LavioletteRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career points | 1,041 | — |
| Art Ross Trophies | 1 | — |
| Ted Lindsay Awards | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| NHL games played | 1,306 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 1 |
| Professional seasons | — | 15 |
| NHA games | — | 178 |
| Franchise founding roles | — | 1 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
Daniel Sedin leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Jack Laviolette — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Laviolette scores higher on dominance, honours. D. Sedin leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. D. Sedin: 83.0, Laviolette: 83.0.
Make your case for D. Sedin vs Laviolette. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.